Gagliano v. Gutierrez (B332387) We successfully represented the respondent in a custody appeal.
Armstrong v. Gordon (C097489) The court of appeal agreed with our arguments, reducing “lost profits” damages by $170,000.
In In re Marriage of Goldman (2025) 107 Cal.App.5th 1258, the Court ruled that, although the defense of “laches” was available in family law cases to enforce marital settlement agreements.
Tanguay v. Lavallee (G063471) We successfully represented the respondent in this appeal pertaining to real property and defaults.
Marriage of Sayaye (B331257) In an appeal dealing with the interpretation of Family Code section 4007
The Court of Appeal agreed with our arguments concerning the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.
The Court of Appeal reversed trial court orders, requiring compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act reversal.
The Appellate Division of the Superior Court reversed a trial court order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend.
The Court of Appeal agreed “laches” did not apply to an action to register an out-of-state support order.
